|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To review product information and
specifications, visit :
www.micronet.com
www.fantomdrives.com
www.sancube.com
Maxattach advantages versus FILE SERVERSback to top:
Question: Would you consider a higher capacity more cost-effective file serving solution?
· Both are Windows based
· Significantly less expensive for more capacity ($/GB)
· No CALs
· Interoperable across platforms (Windows, Unix/Linux, MacIntosh & Novell)
· Plug & Play without server downtime
· Remote Management
· Snapshot capability
· 1 U rack mount form factor
· Accessible to all users on the network
· Maintains same security measures
Maxattach advantages versus TAPEback to top:
Question: Which would you rather manage disk or tape?
· Easier to manage disk (don’t have to change tapes etc.)
· Much faster restoration of data when needed
· Offers near-line back-up rather than off-line back-up
· Mirror two Maxattach for off-site back-up
· Significantly less Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
· Disk is more reliable than tape
· You can mirror 2 NAS units at separate sites for disaster recovery
Maxattach advantages versus SANback to top:
Question: For data that doesn’t require optimal performance would you consider a more cost-effective storage solution?
· Significantly less expensive
· Uses existing IP Ethernet network rather than build fiber network
· Offers more cost-effective storage for data that is not mission critical or high performance
· Data is available to all users on the network
Question: Have you considered a Maxattach that is running a Windows OS with much greater connectivity?
· Powered by Windows OS – better performance and compatibility
· Dual 10/100 Ethernet ports
· Gigabit Ethernet port
· SCSI port for local tape back-up
· PSM Snapshot technology
· Integrated software solutions (EMS & SVS)
