Comparing Raid Configurations; New, used and refurbished

 
 
"A "

Product Catagories
Battery BackUPS
CD/DVD Duplicators
Compaq
FibreChannel/HBA's
Hard Drives

Hard Drive Duplicators
HP
IBM
Iomega
Laptops
Networking Solutions
Media
Optical Drives
Processor/Video Upgrades
Printers

SCSI Adaptors
SUN

Tape Drives
UMAX Scanners
USB/FIREWIRE Solutions

 

 

 

 

 

c2it makes it easy to send and receive money online with your friends and family. Click here to see how:



PayPal lets any business or consumer with an email address to securely, conveniently, and cost-effectively send and receive payments online.

Comparing Raid Configurations; New, used and refurbished
 

 

Celerity FC Storage | Host Adapters | Bridges | FC Hubs | FC Rack Systems | Storage Array | Workgroup Solutions | Enterprise Solution |  Raid OverviewWhat is Diamond Array Storage
What is ADXT Technology | ATTO iPBridge and Microsoft Windows | ATTO and Apple-Mac Xserve Raid | Fibre Channel Storage Connectivity

ATTO Diamond Array Out performs Nexsan ATAboy2 Array

Introduction | Origins of Raid | Original Raid Levels | Raid Today

Raid Summary:

Raid 0: Striped Disk Array | Raid 1: Mirrored Disk Array | Raid 10: Mirroring and Striping | Raid 0,1: Striping and Mirroring | Raid 3: Striping with dedicated parity disk | Raid 5: Striping and Parity

Comparing Raid Configurations | Raid Set-up Considerations

 

 

 

 

V. RAID Summary
RAID can be a powerful tool in a storage environment. Using a RAID storage subsystem has the following advantages:
• Provides fault-tolerance by mirroring or parity operation.
• Increases disk access speed by breaking data into several blocks when reading/writing to several drives in parallel.
• Simplifies management by weaving multiple drives together to form a large volume or groups of volumes.
Today, the major RAID levels available offer the following characteristics:


A. RAID 0: Striped Disk Array
Raid 0 is not a fault tolerant RAID solution, if one drive fails, all data within the entire array is lost. It is used where raw speed is the only (or major) objective. It provides the highest storage efficiency of all array types.
Pro’s
• Improved I/O performance
• Most capacity-efficiency RAID level
• Ability to create large logical volumes.
Con’s
• RAID 0 does not utilize disk space for redundancy.
• If one disk fails, all data within the stripe set is lost.
Configuration
• RAID 0 array’s are made by grouping two or more physical disks together to create a virtual disk and making this virtual disk appear as one physical disk to the host. Each physical drives storage space is partitioned into stripes. The stripes are then interleaved so that the virtual disk is made up of alternating strips from each drive.
• To increase performance, RAID 0 writes block level data across all available stripes in the RAID 0 group, enabling parallel disk I/O, which optimizes I/O performance.
• Ideally, the size of the stripe is large enough to fit one record. The record broken into smaller sizes and evenly distributed across all drives in the stripe group.
Uses of RAID 0: RAID 0 should be used with applications that require the highest level of performance and use non-critical or temporary data, such as:
• Full motion video editing applications
• Prepress editing applications
• Scratch files for CAD
• Any application where the original content is backed up and can be easily restored. The time saved in doing normal data processing work with RAID 0 more than makes up for the time lost in infrequent disk crash events.
 

B. RAID 1: Mirrored Disk Array
RAID 1 provides complete protection and is used in applications containing mission critical data. It uses paired disks, where one physical disk is partnered with a second physical disk. Each physical disk contains the same exact data to form a single virtual drive.
Complete data protection is achieved by simultaneously writing two exact, block level copies, of data to each disk in a mirrored pair. There is no striping. Read performance is improved since either disk can be read at the same time. Write performance is the same as for single disk storage. RAID-i provides the best performance and the best fault-tolerance in a multi-user system.
Wfth RAID 1, the host will see what it believes to be a single physical disk of a specific size. (The host does not know or care about the mirrored pair) The RAID controller manages where the data is written and read. This allows one disk to fail without the host ever knowing, providing time for service personnel to replace the failed drive and initiate a rebuild.
Pro’s:
• Highest level of protection
- Mirroring provides 100% duplication of data.
• Read performance is faster than a single disk; (if the array controller is capable of performing simultaneous reads from both devices of a mirrored pair)
• Delivers the best performance of any redundant array type during a rebuild.
o No re-construction of data is needed. If a disk fails, copying on a block by block basis to a new disk is all that is required.
o No performance hit when a disk fails; storage appears to function normally to outside world.
• The only choice for fault tolerance, if only two drives are used.
Con’s
• Raid 1 writes the information twice, because of this there is a minor performance penalty when compared to writing to a single disk.
• I/O performance in a mixed read-write environment is essentially no better than the performance of a single disk storage system.
• Requires two disks for 100% redundancy; doubling the cost.
Uses of RAID 1:
RAID 1 provides the most complete protection, however, it also requires duplication of physical disks. In the past, this RAID level was used exclusively in smaller mission critical networks to keep costs down. As the cost of storage arrays decline, many system architects are reconsidering the use of RAID 1 in larger applications. Typically, these applications involve mostly read-only operations or light read-write operations. An example of a typical RAID 1 implementation is a data entry network. It is recommended for applications where:
• Data availability is very important
• Speed of read access is very important
• Read activity is heavy
• Applications needing logging or record keeping


C. RAID 10: Mirroring and Striping
RAID 10 consists of multiple sets of mirrored drives. These mirrored drives are then striped together to create the final virtual drive. The result is an extremely scalable mirror array, capable of performing reads and writes significantly faster (since the disk operations are spread over more drive heads).
Pro’s:
• Very high reliability
o Because there are multiple mirror sets, this configuration can actually handle multiple disk failures and still survive (*with one exception).
• Provides highest performance with data protection
• By striping multiple mirror sets, RAID 10 can create larger virtual drives. The host computer will see what it believes to be a single physical disk of a specific size.
• Can be tuned for either a request-rate intensive or transfer-rate intensive environment
*Disk failures occurring within the same mirror set are the exception which is extremely rare.
Con’s:
• Like Raid 1, RAID 10 writes the information twice, because of this there is a minor performance penalty when compared to writing to a single disk.
• I/O performance in a mixed read-write environment is essentially no better than the performance of a single disk storage system.
• Requires an additional disk to make up each mirror set.
Uses of RAID 10:
Applications where high performance and reliability are paramount are ideal for RAID 10. Examples would be on-line transaction processing environment and financial transaction processing environment. It is recommended for applications where:
• Data availability is critically important
• Overall performance is very important


D. RAID (0+1): Striping and Mirroring
Not to be confused with RAID 10 (they are very different). Raid 0+1 flips the order of RAID 10. Drives are first striped, then these drives are mirrored. Typically, two or more disks are striped to create one segment and an equal number of drives are striped to form an additional segment. These two striped segments are then mirrored to create the final virtual drive.
Pro’s
• High I/O performance
• Ability to create large logical volumes
Con’s
• Reliability is less than RAID 1 and 10. If one disk fails you essentially, have a RAID 0 configuration. Due to the multiple disks that make up the RAID 0 segment, the probability of a disk failure is greater.
• Requires duplicate drives. Capacity of physical drives is half.
Uses of RAID 0+1:
Applications that require high performance, but are not overly concerned with achieving maximum reliability.


E. RAID 3: Striping with Dedicated Parity Disk
RAID 3 is a fault tolerant version of RAID 1 (Striping). Fault tolerance is achieved by adding an extra disk to the array and dedicating it to storing parity information. Parity information is generated and written during write operations and checked on reads. It requires a minimum of three drives and provides data protection.
 

In the event of a disk failure, data recovery is accomplished by calculating the exclusive OR (XOR) of the information recorded on the other drives. Since an I/O operation addresses all drives at the same time, RAID-3 cannot overlap I/O. Forthis reason, RAID-3 is best for single-usersystems with long record applications
Pro’s
• Good data protection
• Good write performance
• Good read performance
• The amount of useable space is the number of physical drives in the array minus 1.
Con’s
• A single disk failure reduces the array to RAID 0
• Performance is impacted when degraded
• Poor performance with small data transfers.
• Limited to single user environments.
Uses of RAID 3:
This version of RAID is best suited for:
• Single user, single tasking environments with large data transfers.
• Heavy write applications.
• Large volumes of data are stored


F. RAID 5: Striping and Parity
Raid 5 is similar to RAID 3 but the parity is not stored on one dedicated drive, instead parity information is interspersed across the drive array. RAID 5 requires a minimum of 3 drives. One drive can fail without affecting the availability of data. In the event of a failure, the controller regenerates the lost data of the failed drive from the other surviving drives.
By distributing parity across the arrays member disks, RAID Level 5 reduces (but does not eliminate) the write bottleneck. The result is asymmetrical performance, with reads substantially outperforming writes. To reduce or eliminate this intrinsic asymmetry, RAID level 5 is often augmented with techniques such as caching and parallel multiprocessors.
Pro’s:
• Best suited for heavy read applications.
• The amount of useable space is the number of physical drives in the virtual drive minus 1. Con’s
• A single disk failure reduces the array to RAID 0
• Performance is slower than RAID 1 when rebuilding
• Write performance is slower than read (write penalty)
• Block transfer rate is equal to single disk rate
Uses of RAID 5:
RAID 5 is a general-purpose RAID storage solution. It is recommended for applications where:
• Data availability is important
• Large volumes of data are stored
• Multi tasking applications using I/O transfers of different sizes
• Good read and moderate write performance is important
 

G. Comparing RAID configurations
Each of the described RAID levels offers different characteristics in terms of cost and performance. The following table compares the cost, data availability, and I/O performance of the commonly known RAID levels. I/O performance is shown both in terms of large I/O requests, or relative ability to move data, and random I/O request rate, or relative ability to satisfy I/O requests. Since each RAID level has inherently different performance characteristics relative to these two metrics

1 The data transfer capacity and I/ 0 request rate columns reflect only I/O performance inherent to the RAID model, and do not include the effect of other features, such as caching.

H. RAID Set-up Considerations
Setting up a fault tolerant RAID array involves trading off economy for MTDL (Mean time to Data Loss). MTDL is the probable time to failure for any component that makes data inaccessible.
If your data is backed up and performance and cost are your primary concern, then RAID 0 is the logical choice.
If you determine that you need data protection, then you have two choices to protect your data, Parity or Mirrored arrays.
The “cost” of data protection for a Parity RAID array is the equivalent of one disk per RAID group. At first glance, it would seem to be a no-brainer to select Parity Raid over Mirrored RAID

• When a drive fails in a parity RAID array (RAID 3 or 5), the array becomes a RAID 0-stripe group. If a second drive failure occurs before the array completes a rebuild, then you loose all data within the array.
If you are comfortable with this, then Parity RAID is probably the most economical solution for you. It would also seem to be very cost effective to build parity arrays with several disks, however, consider the following when configuring your parity array:
• More disks in a parity RAID array affects write performance adversely.
• More disks in any RAID array increases the probability of a drive failure,
• Modern disk drives can be as large as 160 GB. By creating a parity array with several disks, the capacity of the array skyrockets, dramatically increasing resynchronization time after a disk failure. This has a major impact on array performance and forces, the array to run “unprotected” for an extended period.
If you determine that the performance and/or protection limitations of parity RAID are too great, then a Mirrored (RAID 1) array or a dual level array (such as RAID 10) should be your choice.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comparing Raid Configurations; New, used and refurbished

Wholesale distributors of data storage drives, tape libraries, storage media and archival solutions.

Representing storage media manufacturers like:
BASF, Canon, DEC, Dysan, Ecrix, Emtec, Exabyte, Fuji, Fujitsu, Graham, Hewlett Packard, IBM, Imation, Iomega, Kodak, Maxell, Maxoptix, Onstream, LMSI, Panasonic, PinnacleMicro, Phillips, Pioneer, Plasmon, Ricoh, Sony, Syquest, TDK, and Verbatim

Comparing Raid Configurations; New, used and refurbished

9 to 5 provides cutting edge technologies from drive giants like:
ADIC, Archive, ATL, Benchmark, BreeceHill, Colorado, Compaq, DEC, Ecrix, Exabyte, EZQuest, Fujitsu, Hewlett Packard, IBM, Iomega, Irwin, Kodak, Lacie, LMSI, M4 Data, Maynard Maxtor, Maxoptix, Micronet, Mitsubishi, Mountain, OnStream, Olympus, Overland Data, Panasonic, Philips, Pinnacle Micro, Plextor, Quantum, Ricoh, Rimage, Seagate, Smart and Friendly, Sony, Spectralogic, StorageTek, Straightline, Sun, Tandberg, Teac, Tecmar, WangDat, Wangtek, Western Digital, Xcerta, Yamaha


Comparing Raid Configurations; New, used and refurbished

Including all major storage platforms such as:
DLT, AIT, LTO, SUPER DLT, Mammoth, Optical, 4MM, 8MM, Magstar, Travan, ", ", Reel-to-reel, 3480, 3490, 3570, 3590, 9840, 9940, JAZ, ZIP, CDR-RW, DVD-R/RAM

And support peripherals, host adaptors, controllers, bridges, routers and enclosures from the leaders in the market with:
Adaptec, ATTO, CI DESIGN, Emulex, GadZoox, Initio, JMR, JNI, Qlogic, Slim


Comparing Raid Configurations; New, used and refurbished

© Copyright 2007.
*Price and availabilities subject to change without any notice. Not responsible for typographical errors.


Battery BackUPS | CD/Hard Disk Duplicators  | Compaq | FibreChannel/HBA's | Hard Drives
HP | IBM | Iomega | Networking Solutions | Media
Optical Drives | Processor/Video Upgrades | Printers | SCSI Adaptors | SUN | Tape Drives
Site Map | UMAX Scanners |
USB/FIREWIRE Solutions

tape drives | hard drives | optical drives | storage media | right storage solution for you | drive liquidation/specials

Archive | ADIC | Benchmark | BreeceHill |Certance|Compaq | Cybernetics| Dell | Exabyte | HP |
 IBM | Lacie| Maxoptix | Overland | OnStream | Plasmon | QualStar | Quantum |
 Quantum/ATL | Seagate | Sony | Spectralogic | Sun | StorageTek | Tandberg
| TechMar | Wangtek

Drive FAQs: AIT Drives | LTO Drives | SDLT Drives | DLT Drives | LTO 2 VS SDLT 320